Blogs > It's Time To Take A Stand

Being a business theatre producer has allowed Brian the opportunity to meet and work with some very fascinating people from a variety of backgrounds which, in turn, has helped shape his knowledge and his opinions. His blog will not always be political, it will be about a lifetime of subjects, and nothing is off limits. “Few people have original thoughts, we are shaped by the people we know and meet” he says.



Monday, December 21, 2009

Cash for Clunkers - Japanese Style


Japan 2 - USA 0.

That is about the net results of the Japanese Cash for Clunkers program designed to shutout all U.S. made vehicles.

According to the Automotive News, Japanese automakers sold 319,342 vehicles under the U.S. cash-for-clunkers program this year, almost half of the roughly 677,000 vehicles purchased. About 115,000 of those Japanese vehicles were imported.

Now Japan is running its own stimulus plan and the rules shut out all U.S.-brand vehicles.

Japan's cash for clunkers plan pays ¥250,000 ($2,778) to buyers who trade in cars that are at least 13 years old that meet Japan's 2010 emissions standards. Buyers with no trade-in get $1,111 if their purchase beats Japan's 2010 emissions standards by 15 percent or more but no U.S. vehicle qualify, according to James B. Treece of the Automotive News.

Our government representatives at work with their usual efficiency. The rules for the Japanese program were laid out more than half a year ago. Yet nobody seems to have seen this coming. U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk only broached the matter when a Detroit 3 lobbying group prodded him this month, after the program was extended.

In 1995, under President Clinton, the U.S. threatened to impose a 100% tariff on Japanese luxury cars but that was just "cheap political talk" and Japan understood; the U.S. would never follow through with the threat.

We don't need the U.S. government to impose trade tariffs. We are and should be committed to free trade but it should be FREE TRADE for all countries, not just the U.S.

What we really need is for the American people to vote with their wallets. The real vote will come later in 2010.

2 Comments:

Blogger Bruce Fealk said...

Brian, free trade has been a disaster for the United States. NAFTA, even though it was instituted under a Democratic President, was the giant sucking sound that Ross Perot said it would be.

What we need is fair trade. China doesn't let companies sell things in China that aren't made there. Imagine if the United States instituted that policy, how many more good paying jobs we'd have in the United States.

We should have a race to the top on wages, instead of the race to the bottom that fair trade is bringing to this country. Some of the lowest wage countries in the world are ruled by dictators. American workers shouldn't have to compete with countries that hold a gun to your head and make you work for ridiculously low wages.

We must rebuild our manufacturing sector if we are ever going to bring back middle class prosperity.

December 25, 2009 at 12:07 PM 
Blogger Brian J Perks said...

I never said Free Trade should be a one way street. We need Free Trade to be worldwide. If China or Japan want to restrict Free Trade with the U.S., we should do exactly the same as they do, until they learn that Free Trade is a two way street.

Not Fair Trade, Free Trade. It will benefit us all, even them but they would rather play protectionists.

December 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM 

Post a Comment

How to post a comment:
1. Select the Post to which you want to Comment.
2. Scroll down to the add a comment area
3. Select a profile (Google Account, LiveJournal, WordPress, TypePad, AIM, etc..)
4. Create an account or sign in.
5. Post comment.
6. Input security code.

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home